LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 56

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 6.

Evidence depth

56 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 8 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.2

claude-3-7-sonnet-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins0 wins6 wins
Where it leadsNo dataCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
Context windowNo data128K tokens
Max outputNo data16.4K tokens
ReleasedNo dataDec 2025
ModalitiesNo data

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAIGPT-5.2
ModelPool5 tests
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.257/M / $1.29/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 5256ms

input / output

$0.150/M / $1.20/M

Rnglg2 API5 tests
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

55 tok/s / 1434ms

input / output

No data

3173721 API0 tests
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

claude-3-7-sonnet

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$2.00/M / $16.00/M

AASS API0 tests
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

AI API0 tests
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

My Claude Code
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

claude-3-7-sonnet-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.104/M / $0.521/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$2.60/M / $20.83/M

Newagiai
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.411/M / $2.05/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.240/M / $1.92/M

SanShui API
Claude

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.411/M / $2.05/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.240/M / $1.92/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 56 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.66 verified data pointsClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:23 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.