Data points: 81
Model compare
The readout for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-3.5 Turbo, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Haiku 4.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 61.3 to 38.7.
Evidence depth
81 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Haiku 4.5
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-3.5 Turbo: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 61.3 pts | 38.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 4.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Jan 2024 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2021-09-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | openai/gpt-3.5-turbo |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-3.5 Turbo: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Provider coverage).
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Haiku 4.5
49.6
Avg. score
GPT-3.5 Turbo
40
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads by 1.4
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 14.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 8.4
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5
0.80 s
Rank #28/139 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner0.70 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
0.80 s
Rank #40/139 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner0.70 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
97.3 tok/s
Rank #65/139 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner138.2 tok/s
Rank #39/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
$5.00/M
Rank #106/163 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner$1.50/M
Rank #54/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
$2.00/M
Rank #103/163 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner$0.750/M
Rank #60/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1.00/M
Rank #100/163 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
winner$0.500/M
Rank #70/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner80.0%
Rank #61/125 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
46.2%
Rank #124/125 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner64.6%
Rank #130/187 · confidence 4
GPT-3.5 Turbo
29.7%
Rank #186/187 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 112 tok/s / 1733ms input / output No data | GPT-3.5 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-3.5 Turbo speed / latency 54 tok/s / 9591ms input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 109 tok/s / 2221ms input / output No data | GPT-3.5 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 160 tok/s / 2639ms input / output No data | GPT-3.5 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 97 tok/s / 1336ms input / output No data | GPT-3.5 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-3.5 Turbo gpt-3.5-turbo-16k speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-c speed / latency No data input / output $0.0068/request | GPT-3.5 Turbo gpt-3.5-turbo-16k speed / latency No data input / output $2.79/M |
Weighted outcome: Claude Haiku 4.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
