Data points: 50
The readout for Claude Instant 1.2 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 3.
Evidence depth
50 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Instant 1.2 vs GPT-5.2claude-instant-1-2-vs-gpt-5-2 | Model A Claude Instant 1.2 | Model B GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | No data | Cheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window | No data | 128K tokens |
| Max output | No data | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | No data | Dec 2025 |
| Modalities | No data | Input FileImageText Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.2-chat |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Instant 1.2 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Instant 1.2 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Instant 1.2 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
180txt API0 tests | Claude Instant 1.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AIGCBAR0 tests | Claude Instant 1.2 claude-instant-1.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $14.40/M / $43.20/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-xhigh speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $3.15/M / $25.20/M |
KFCV500 tests | Claude Instant 1.2 claude-instant-1.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.110/M / $0.329/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-openai-compact speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $10.27/M / $10.27/M |
Last API0 tests | Claude Instant 1.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
MagicAI0 tests | Claude Instant 1.2 claude-instant-1.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $4.00/M / $4.00/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $300.00/M / $2400.00/M |
Claude Instant 1.2 claude-instant-1.2 speed / latency No data input / output $1.63/M / $1.63/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-2025-12-11 speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M / $600.00/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Instant 1.2 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Instant 1.2 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Instant 1.2 Claude Instant 1.2 does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 50 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Instant 1.2 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
