Data points: 77
The readout for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 6.
Evidence depth
77 data points
Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.2claude-opus-4-1-vs-gpt-5-2 | Model A Claude Opus 4.1 | Model B GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 6 wins |
| Where it leads | No data | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.1 exposes 200K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 32K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Dec 2025 |
| Modalities | Input ImageTextFile Output Text | Input FileImageText Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 | openai/gpt-5.2-chat |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15.00/M#43 | $1.75/M#35 |
| Output price | $75.00/M#52 | $14.00/M#43 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.98 s#43 | 115.69 s#109 |
| Blended price | $30.00/M#73 | $4.81/M#62 |
| Time to first token | 1.98 s#70 | 115.69 s#108 |
| Output speed | 36.8 tok/s#104 | 72.8 tok/s#71 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
N1N20 tests | Claude Opus 4.1 speed / latency 17 tok/s / 3847ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data |
PackyAPI10 tests | Claude Opus 4.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 94 tok/s / 11492ms input / output No data |
ModelPool5 tests | Claude Opus 4.1 claude-opus-4-1-20250805 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $1.29/M / $6.43/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency 64 tok/s / 5256ms input / output $0.150/M / $1.20/M |
Rnglg2 API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 55 tok/s / 1434ms input / output No data |
WONG公益站5 tests | Claude Opus 4.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 2953ms input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.1 c/claude-opus-4-1-20250805 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0017/M / $0.0017/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $1.75/M / $14.00/M | |
Claude Opus 4.1 claude-opus-4-1-20250805 speed / latency No data input / output $0.205/M / $1.03/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-medium speed / latency No data input / output $0.024/M / $0.192/M | |
Claude Opus 4.1 claude-opus-4-1-20250805 speed / latency No data input / output $0.616/M / $3.08/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-xhigh speed / latency No data input / output $0.072/M / $0.575/M | |
Claude Opus 4.1 claude-opus-4-1-20250805 speed / latency No data input / output $0.342/M / $1.71/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.120/M / $0.959/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.1 Claude Opus 4.1 does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 77 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
