LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  3. Compare
  5. Models
  7. Claude Opus 4.6 vs Deepseek Prover V2
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 59

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek Prover v2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.

Evidence depth

59 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 7 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Change comparison

Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.

Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek Prover v2

claude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-prover-v2

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins0 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Category performance

Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.

Model A coverage
7 / 8
Model B coverage
0 / 8
Shared
0 shared categories
Claude Opus 4.6DeepSeek Prover v2
Category performanceCompare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.AgentsCodingReasoningKnowledgeMathMultilingualMultimodalInstruction following

Avg. score

Claude Opus 4.6

65.8

Avg. score

DeepSeek Prover v2

-

Selected category

Agents

Claude Opus 4.6

Professional benchmark details

Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.

No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek Prover v2
Winner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

84

72

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek Prover v2
5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

45 tok/s / 6167ms

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek Prover v2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek Prover v2
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

DeepSeek Prover v2

DeepSeek Prover v2 does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 59 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek Prover v2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

No data
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window1M tokensNo data
Max output128K tokensNo data
ReleasedApr 2026No data
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
No data
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
None listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data
84
80
100
DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

deepseek-prover-v2-7b

No audit yet

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

deepseek-prover-v2-7b

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

91VIP0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DMXAPI0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Future Hub0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Futureppo0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

钱多多 API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$2.45/M / $12.24/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek Prover v2

deepseek-prover-v2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$3.92/M / $15.66/M

小水管 API
View report
小水管 API
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 19, 2026, 09:22 AM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.