Data points: 42
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 Turbo, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
42 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 4 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 4 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1 Turboclaude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-r1-turbo | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B DeepSeek R1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | No data |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Context window | No data | No data |
| Max output | No data | No data |
| Released | No data | No data |
| Modalities | No data | No data |
| Features | None listed | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek R1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek R1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek R1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
AIO通用智能服务平台0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | DeepSeek R1 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Seamee API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | DeepSeek R1 Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Yun API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.685/M / $3.42/M | DeepSeek R1 Turbo deepseek/deepseek-r1-turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $10.27/M / $20.55/M |
钱多多 API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6-medium speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $2.45/M / $12.24/M | DeepSeek R1 Turbo deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528-Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $4.90/M / $14.69/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek R1 Turbo: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek R1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | DeepSeek R1 Turbo DeepSeek R1 Turbo does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 42 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1 Turbo into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
