LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 67

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

67 data points

Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with DeepSeek V3

The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3

claude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-v3

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsFree providers, Provider coverageCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperAnthropicNo data
Context window1M tokensNo data
Max output128K tokensNo data
ReleasedApr 2026No data
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
No data
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
None listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$0.890/M#14
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$0.400/M#16
SciCode
45.7%#20
35.4%#75
Blended price
$10.00/M#68
$0.523/M#24
GPQA
84.0%#38
55.7%#113
HLE
18.6%#43
3.6%#99

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3
AIHubMix30 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

speed / latency

95 tok/s / 519ms

input / output

No data

钠 API25 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

42 tok/s / 2282ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

speed / latency

210 tok/s / 2424ms

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

GOU API10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

51 tok/s / 9040ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ModelPool10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

84 tok/s / 3916ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Seamee API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

deepseek-chat-search

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

10dian-API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.060/M / $0.060/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

deepseek-v3

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

CookingAI
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3

deepseek-v3-0324

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage.

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: DeepSeek V3 leads across 67 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:50 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.