LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 77

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

77 data points

Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2

claude-opus-4-6-vs-deepseek-v3-2

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsAverage speed, First-token latency, Provider coverageCheapest input price, Free providers, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.DeepSeek V3.2 exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window1M tokens131.1K tokens
Max output128K tokens64K tokens
ReleasedApr 2026Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeDeepSeek
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastdeepseek/deepseek-v3.2
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$0.500/M#18
SciCode
45.7%#20
38.7%#54
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$1.60/M#21
Blended price
$10.00/M#68
$0.775/M#31
GPQA
84.0%#38
75.1%#68
HLE
18.6%#43
10.5%#64

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
云智API85 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

39 tok/s / 3650ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

29 tok/s / 3036ms

input / output

No data

6345ywz API35 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

227 tok/s / 1884ms

input / output

No data

RinkoAI30 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

25 tok/s / 2484ms

input / output

No data

N1N20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

46 tok/s / 2559ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

37 tok/s / 1522ms

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Seamee API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-3.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

紫脑喵
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2-exp

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

Zero API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.342/M / $1.71/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.018/M / $0.028/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage.

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 77 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:53 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.