Data points: 65
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
65 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 2 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instructclaude-opus-4-6-vs-dracarys-llama-3-1-instruct | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests | First-token latency, Free providers |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | Anthropic | No data |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 89 56100100100 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct No audit yet |
小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 84 728480100 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
素墨API10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 47 tok/s / 2344ms input / output No data | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct speed / latency 16 tok/s / 779ms input / output No data |
Cuz AI5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 2285ms input / output $5.00/M / $25.00/M | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M / $75.00/M |
小水管 API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 6167ms input / output $0/M / $0/M | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M / $0/M |
6345ywz API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
91VIP API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0.500/M / $0.500/M | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct abacusai/dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0.050/M / $0.050/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $5.00/M / $25.00/M | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct abacusai/dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0.100/M / $0.100/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 65 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 Instruct into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
