Data points: 62
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
62 data points
Includes 3 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Liteclaude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-2-0-flash-lite | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 24.7%#102 |
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 54.2%#115 |
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 4.4%#92 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
Rnglg2 API15 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 3926ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
丸美小沐15 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite speed / latency 188 tok/s / 1056ms input / output No data |
向量引擎10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite speed / latency 135 tok/s / 640ms input / output No data |
哈基米API10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite speed / latency 175 tok/s / 3024ms input / output No data |
TradingBase API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 1437ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6-medium speed / latency No data input / output $0.685/M / $3.42/M | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite gemini-2.0-flash-lite-preview speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.041/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 62 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
