LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 96

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

96 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 3 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

claude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-2-5-flash

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsFirst-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverageCheapest input price, Average speed, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.Gemini 2.5 Flash exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokens
Max output128K tokens65.5K tokens
ReleasedApr 2026Jun 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

FileImageTextAudiovideo

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeGemini
Knowledge cutoffNo data2025-01-31
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastgoogle/gemini-2.5-flash
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 2.5 Flash
Time to first answer token
1.44 s#34
0.54 s#10
Output speed
44.9 tok/s#96
194.9 tok/s#13
Time to first token
1.44 s#57
0.54 s#14
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$0.300/M#15
SciCode
45.7%#20
29.1%#93
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$2.50/M#27
Blended price
$10.00/M#68
$0.850/M#35
GPQA
84.0%#38
68.3%#83

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 2.5 Flash
Yuan APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

89

View report
56100100100
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

gemini-2.5-flash

No audit yet

钠 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

80

View report
668470100
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

gemini-2.5-flash

No audit yet

RenRen APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

78

View report
70728088
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

gemini-2.5-flash

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 2.5 Flash
Rnglg2 API20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

speed / latency

189 tok/s / 11433ms

input / output

No data

钠 API20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

42 tok/s / 2282ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ModelPool10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

84 tok/s / 3916ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

46 tok/s / 2559ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

speed / latency

200 tok/s / 8207ms

input / output

No data

OpenRouter10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

speed / latency

141 tok/s / 2052ms

input / output

No data

Crond
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

c/claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0017/M / $0.0017/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

gemini-2.5-flash-nothinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.300/M / $2.40/M

柠檬API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

流式抗截断/gemini-2.5-flash-maxthinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0050/M / $0.0050/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 2.5 Flash
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 96 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:53 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.