LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 62

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.

Evidence depth

62 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 7 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro

claude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-pro

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Gemini

Gemini Pro

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins0 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsNo data
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.Gemini Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokens
Max output128K tokens65.5K tokens
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2026
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

AudioFileImageTextvideo

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeRouter
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast~google/gemini-pro-latest
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini Pro
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini Pro
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini Pro
TradingBase API5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 1437ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

UoCode5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 2611ms

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Gemini

Gemini Pro

models/gemini-pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.137/M

AAAI0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Aitoke0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Gemini

Gemini Pro

models/gemini-pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.137/M

CaMeL AI0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

初叶🍂Furry API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

Gemini

Gemini Pro

gemini-pro-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.100/M / $0.100/M

ZEN-AI VIP
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.205/M / $1.03/M

Gemini

Gemini Pro

gemini-pro-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.051/M / $0.411/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini Pro
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

Gemini Pro

Gemini Pro does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 62 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:46 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.