Data points: 90
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 1.
Evidence depth
90 data points
Includes 10 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.7 Flashclaude-opus-4-6-vs-glm-4-7-flash | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B GLM-4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 5 wins | 1 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.6
64.1
Avg. score
GLM-4.7 Flash
33.2
Selected category
Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 25.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0
Rank #5/96 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
GLM-4.7 Flash
11.0
Rank #91/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-01
Claude Opus 4.6
2.11 s
Rank #84/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner0.88 s
Rank #31/113 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
47.6 tok/s
Rank #93/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner101.2 tok/s
Rank #51/113 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner2.11 s
Rank #51/113 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
20.63 s
Rank #78/113 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$5.00/M
Rank #124/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.070/M
Rank #5/138 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$10.00/M
Rank #125/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.153/M
Rank #10/138 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$25.00/M
Rank #125/138 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
winner$0.400/M
Rank #12/138 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0%
Rank #37/152 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
58.1%
Rank #120/152 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6%
Rank #46/150 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
7.1%
Rank #83/150 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7%
Rank #22/149 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7 Flash
33.7%
Rank #95/149 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Winner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 88 64 |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 51 tok/s / 9040ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage. | GLM-4.7 Flash GLM-4.7 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 90 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.7 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Recent tests |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | GLM-4.7 Flash exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Z.ai |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 202.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | z-ai/glm-4.7-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
GLM-4.7 Flash glm-4.7-flash-free No audit yet |
GLM-4.7 Flash
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
6i2 API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 280 tok/s / 3242ms input / output No data | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Cuz AI5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 2285ms input / output No data | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Moyanjdc API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M/$0/M | GLM-4.7 Flash glm-4.7-flash speed / latency 53 tok/s / 20537ms input / output $0/M/$0/M |
|---|
TradingBase API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 1437ms input / output No data | GLM-4.7 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0.342/M/$1.71/M | GLM-4.7 Flash z-ai/glm-4.7-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.0049/M/$0.033/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
