Data points: 35
Model compare
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7 FlashX, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.6. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 100 to 0.
Evidence depth
35 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7 FlashX: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 FlashX |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 100.0 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 FlashX |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Zhipu AI |
| Released | Feb 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7 FlashX: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 has these operational advantages: Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage.
GLM-4.7 FlashX
GLM-4.7 FlashX does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.6
53.4
Avg. score
GLM-4.7 FlashX
-
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 FlashX |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7 FlashX |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 FlashX speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 FlashX speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 FlashX speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 FlashX speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 FlashX speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.6. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
|---|
