LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 105

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 2.

Evidence depth

105 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 5 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 21 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5

claude-opus-4-6-vs-glm-5

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

ChatGLM

GLM-5

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins3 wins2 wins
Where it leadsAverage speed, First-token latency, Provider coverageCheapest input price, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.GLM-5 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperAnthropicZhipu AI
Context window1M tokens202.8K tokens
Max output128K tokensNo data
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeOther
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastz-ai/glm-5
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
ChatGLMGLM-5
SciCode
45.7%#20
46.2%#19
HLE
18.6%#43
27.2%#22
Time to first token
1.44 s#57
0.84 s#25
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$1.00/M#26
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$3.20/M#29
Time to first answer token
1.44 s#34
41.94 s#91
GPQA
84.0%#38
82.0%#49
Blended price
$10.00/M#68
$1.55/M#47

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
ChatGLMGLM-5
VSLLMWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

94

View report
76100100100
ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

No audit yet

小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

84

View report
728480100
ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

No audit yet

钠 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

80

View report
668470100
ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

No audit yet

Omini ApiWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

78

View report
70728088
ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

No audit yet

RenRen APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

78

View report
70728088
ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
ChatGLMGLM-5
OptAI25 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2542ms

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.0001/M / $0.0001/M

Kunkunout API20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

40 tok/s / 16141ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

钠 API20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

42 tok/s / 2282ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Thorbase15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 24098ms

input / output

No data

Seamee API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5

ZhipuAI/GLM-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

小水管 API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

紫脑喵
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5

glm-5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
ChatGLMGLM-5
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage.

GLM-5

GLM-5 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 105 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:48 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.