Data points: 85
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.1, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
85 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-5-1 | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | GPT-5.1 exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Nov 2025 |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input ImageTextFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | openai/gpt-5.1 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 87.3%#19 |
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 43.3%#29 |
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 26.5%#24 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.29 s#28 | 34.80 s#85 |
| Input price | $5.00/M#41 | $1.25/M#30 |
| Output price | $25.00/M#47 | $10.00/M#41 |
| Output speed | 47.1 tok/s#95 | 120.0 tok/s#43 |
| Time to first token | 1.29 s#50 | 34.80 s#99 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
钠 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 80 668470100 | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
钠 API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 42 tok/s / 2282ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Rnglg2 API15 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 3926ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
巨量API12 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 24 tok/s / 7946ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency 139 tok/s / 1654ms input / output No data |
BUZZ10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency 137 tok/s / 3299ms input / output No data |
ModelPool10 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 84 tok/s / 3916ms input / output No data | GPT-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $1.07/M / $8.56/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 c/claude-opus-4-6-thinking speed / latency No data input / output $0.0017/M / $0.0017/M | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1-2025-11-13 speed / latency No data input / output $1.25/M / $10.00/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6-thinking speed / latency No data input / output $0.060/M / $0.060/M | GPT-5.1 gpt-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | GPT-5.1 GPT-5.1 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 85 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
