LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 88

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.1 Codex, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.

Evidence depth

88 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 2 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 19 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex

claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-5-1-codex

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins0 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsNo data
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.GPT-5.1 Codex exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling.
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
Context window1M tokens400K tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens
ReleasedApr 2026Nov 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

TextImage

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastopenai/gpt-5.1-codex
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
Output speed
44.9 tok/s#96
185.7 tok/s#15
SciCode
45.7%#20
40.2%#46
GPQA
84.0%#38
86.0%#26
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$1.25/M#30
HLE
18.6%#43
23.4%#33
Time to first answer token
1.44 s#34
4.25 s#48
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$10.00/M#41
Time to first token
1.44 s#57
4.25 s#80

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
BUZZWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

97

View report
10010010088
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

No audit yet

钠 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

80

View report
668470100
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
钠 API20 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

42 tok/s / 2282ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

发现AI7 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

39 tok/s / 9397ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Completions5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

26 tok/s / 1130ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Cuz AI5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2285ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Seamee API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.07/M / $8.56/M

10dian-API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.060/M / $0.060/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

CHB API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.068/M / $0.342/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.017/M / $0.137/M

老张API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$4.79/M / $23.97/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.019/M / $0.019/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.1 Codex: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

GPT-5.1 Codex

GPT-5.1 Codex does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 88 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:52 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.