LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 48

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.

Evidence depth

48 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 8 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

claude-opus-4-6-vs-jamba-1-5-large-instruct

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins2 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsAverage speed, First-token latency
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperAnthropicNo data
Context windowNo dataNo data
Max outputNo dataNo data
ReleasedNo dataNo data
ModalitiesNo dataNo data
FeaturesNone listedNone listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

89

View report
56100100100

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

jamba-1.5-large-instruct

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct
Cuz AI5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2285ms

input / output

$5.00/M / $25.00/M

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

jamba-1.5-large-instruct

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

素墨API5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

47 tok/s / 2344ms

input / output

No data

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

6345ywz API0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

9527 API0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

AI Claw API0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

初叶🍂Furry API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.500/M / $0.500/M

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

ai21labs/jamba-1.5-large-instruct

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

SMLC666 API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $375.00/M

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

ai21labs/jamba-1.5-large-instruct

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct

Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 48 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Jamba 1.5 Large Instruct into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:25 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.