Data points: 108
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
108 data points
Includes 23 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 28 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ling 2.6 Flashclaude-opus-4-6-vs-ling-2-6-flash | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.6
61.6
Avg. score
Ling 2.6 Flash
39.7
Selected category
Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 34.0
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.6
winner83.0
Rank #8/127 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
37.0
Rank #91/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
2.02 s
Rank #56/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
42.2 tok/s
Rank #126/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner180.9 tok/s
Rank #27/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
2.02 s
Rank #99/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner0.74 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$10.00/M
Rank #152/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.150/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$5.00/M
Rank #151/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.100/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
$25.00/M
Rank #152/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #8/167 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0%
Rank #51/187 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner58.3
Rank #59/88 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
25.0
Rank #84/88 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6%
Rank #60/186 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2%
Rank #125/186 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner48.5
Rank #13/86 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
21.2
Rank #66/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner82.4
Rank #14/100 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
28.5
Rank #85/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7%
Rank #31/184 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1%
Rank #150/184 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7
Rank #34/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1
Rank #88/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
76.0
Rank #47/89 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner95.8
Rank #1/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner91.5
Rank #2/92 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
48.9
Rank #66/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.2
Rank #14/89 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
15.4
Rank #83/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner37.8
Rank #37/98 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
14.1
Rank #86/98 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0
Rank #51/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3
Rank #84/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6
Rank #55/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2
Rank #75/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
winner91.3
Rank #3/75 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
23.5
Rank #72/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
44.6
Rank #62/87 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner57.4
Rank #55/87 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Claude Opus 4.6
84.8
Rank #45/85 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner86.0
Rank #42/85 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Ling 2.6 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 108 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Ling 2.6 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | Ling 2.6 Flash exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | inclusionAI |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
CM-API 公益站0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Dext API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.411/M/$2.06/M | Ling 2.6 Flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0033/M/$0.0099/M |
|---|
OpenRouter0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
OpenRouter Fans0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
