Data points: 82
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2-Omni, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
82 data points
Includes 6 benchmark rows, 3 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omniclaude-opus-4-6-vs-mimo-v2-omni | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | Anthropic | No data |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 36.7%#68 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.44 s#34 | 28.24 s#83 |
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 82.8%#44 |
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 19.9%#40 |
| Time to first token | 1.44 s#57 | 3.00 s#76 |
| Output speed | 44.9 tok/s#96 | 79.3 tok/s#65 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 89 56100100100 | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni No audit yet |
Omini ApiWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 78 70728088 | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni No audit yet |
RenRen APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 78 70728088 | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
Cuz AI5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 2285ms input / output No data | MiMo-V2-Omni speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
UoCode5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 2611ms input / output No data | MiMo-V2-Omni speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
小水管 API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 6167ms input / output No data | MiMo-V2-Omni speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
17NAS API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.438/M / $2.19/M | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.031/M / $0.153/M |
180txt API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiMo-V2-Omni speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency No data input / output $0.589/M / $2.88/M | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni speed / latency No data input / output $0.014/M / $0.014/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6-thinking speed / latency No data input / output $0.342/M / $1.71/M | MiMo-V2-Omni mimo-v2-omni speed / latency No data input / output $0.027/M / $0.137/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2-Omni: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | MiMo-V2-Omni MiMo-V2-Omni is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 82 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
