Data points: 105
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiniMax M2.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.
Evidence depth
105 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 5 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with MiniMax M2.7
The charts below split 22 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7claude-opus-4-6-vs-minimax-m2-7 | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 2 wins | 4 wins |
| Where it leads | First-token latency, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | MiniMax M2.7 exposes 204.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
| Developer | Anthropic | No data |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | minimax/minimax-m2.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5.00/M#41 | $0.300/M#15 |
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 47.0%#15 |
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 28.1%#17 |
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 87.4%#18 |
| Output price | $25.00/M#47 | $1.20/M#18 |
| Blended price | $10.00/M#68 | $0.525/M#25 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.44 s#34 | 58.23 s#96 |
| Time to first token | 1.44 s#57 | 1.59 s#61 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
VSLLMWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 94 76100100100 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 No audit yet |
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 89 56100100100 | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 No audit yet |
小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 84 728480100 | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 No audit yet |
Omini ApiWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 78 70728088 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 No audit yet |
RenRen APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 78 70728088 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
6345ywz API100 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 430 tok/s / 2470ms input / output No data |
OptAI25 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency 43 tok/s / 2542ms input / output $5.00/M / $25.00/M | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0001/M / $0.0001/M |
Kunkunout API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 40 tok/s / 16141ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
钠 API20 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 42 tok/s / 2282ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Rnglg2 API15 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 3926ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $5.00/M / $25.00/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimaxai/minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4.6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.300/M / $1.20/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $5.00/M / $25.00/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0010/M / $0.0010/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage. | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: MiniMax M2.7 leads across 105 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
