Sponsored byFusecodeEnterprise coding API for Claude Code, Codex, and model workflows.
LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Models
  4. Claude Opus 4.6 vs O3 Mini
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 122

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and O3 Mini, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 1.

Evidence depth

122 data points

Includes 26 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 36 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Change comparison

Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.

Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs O3 Mini

claude-opus-4-6-vs-o3-mini

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

OpenAI

O3 Mini

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins5 wins1 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsAverage speed
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.O3 Mini exposes 200K tokens; notable signals: Text input, File input, Text output, Tool calling.
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
Context window1M tokens200K tokens
Max output128K tokens100K tokens
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

TextFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo data2023-10-31
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6openai/o3-mini-high
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Category performance

Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.

Model A coverage
7 / 8
Model B coverage
6 / 8
Shared
6 shared categories
Claude Opus 4.6O3 Mini
Category performanceCompare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.AgentsCodingReasoningKnowledgeMathMultilingualMultimodalInstruction following

Avg. score

Claude Opus 4.6

65.5

Avg. score

O3 Mini

59.2

Selected category

Instruction following

O3 Mini leads by 49.3

Professional benchmark details

Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.

Aggregateverified

BenchLM overall score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

86.0

Rank #7/82 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+31.0

O3 Mini

55.0

Rank #43/82 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Performanceverified

Output speed

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

44.3 tok/s

Rank #66/78 · confidence 4

+180.2 tok/s

O3 Mini

winner

224.5 tok/s

Rank #4/78 · confidence 4

Performanceverified

Time to first answer token

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

1.89 s

Rank #31/78 · confidence 4

+13.41 s

O3 Mini

15.30 s

Rank #48/78 · confidence 4

Performanceverified

Time to first token

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

1.89 s

Rank #51/78 · confidence 4

+13.41 s

O3 Mini

15.30 s

Rank #65/78 · confidence 4

Pricingverified

Output price

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

$25.00/M

Rank #83/95 · confidence 4

+$20.60/M

O3 Mini

winner

$4.40/M

Rank #56/95 · confidence 4

Pricingverified

Blended price

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

$10.00/M

Rank #83/95 · confidence 4

+$8.07/M

O3 Mini

winner

$1.93/M

Rank #57/95 · confidence 4

Pricingverified

Input price

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

$5.00/M

Rank #83/95 · confidence 4

+$3.90/M

O3 Mini

winner

$1.10/M

Rank #58/95 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

BenchLM Reasoning score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

88.2

Rank #7/57 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+20.2

O3 Mini

68.0

Rank #19/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Reasoningverified

MMLU-Pro

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

82.0%

Rank #31/74 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+1.8%

O3 Mini

80.2%

Rank #42/74 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

GPQA

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

84.0%

Rank #32/103 · confidence 4

+6.7%

O3 Mini

77.3%

Rank #54/103 · confidence 4

Reasoningverified

HLE

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

18.6%

Rank #40/103 · confidence 4

+6.3%

O3 Mini

12.3%

Rank #52/103 · confidence 4

Codingverified

SWE-bench Verified

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

80.8

Rank #6/28 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+31.5

O3 Mini

49.3

Rank #26/28 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Codingverified

Terminal-Bench Hard

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

48.5

Rank #9/59 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+41.7

O3 Mini

6.8

Rank #54/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Codingverified

AA Coding Index

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

47.6

Rank #10/61 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+29.7

O3 Mini

17.9

Rank #54/61 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Codingverified

BenchLM Coding score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

84.9

Rank #13/69 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+36.4

O3 Mini

48.5

Rank #45/69 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Codingverified

AA-SciCode

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

45.7

Rank #21/63 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+5.8

O3 Mini

39.9

Rank #39/63 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Codingverified

SciCode

SourceClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

45.7%

Rank #22/101 · confidence 4

+5.9%

O3 Mini

39.8%

Rank #49/101 · confidence 4

Knowledgeverified

BenchLM Knowledge score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

90.1

Rank #9/67 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+29.4

O3 Mini

60.7

Rank #36/67 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Knowledgeverified

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

37.8

Rank #23/66 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+18.8

O3 Mini

19.0

Rank #51/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Knowledgeverified

AA-GPQA Diamond

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

84.0

Rank #29/63 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+9.2

O3 Mini

74.8

Rank #44/63 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Knowledgeverified

AA-HLE

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

18.6

Rank #32/63 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+9.9

O3 Mini

8.7

Rank #42/63 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Multilingualverified

BenchLM Multilingual score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

100.0

Rank #1/50 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+55.2

O3 Mini

44.8

Rank #35/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Multimodalverified

BenchLM Multimodal Grounded score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

76.7

Rank #15/60 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+11.1

O3 Mini

65.6

Rank #26/60 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Instruction followingverified

BenchLM Instruction Following score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

95.3

Rank #3/56 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+10.0

O3 Mini

85.3

Rank #13/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Agentsverified

BenchLM Agentic score

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

80.2

Rank #9/69 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+19.6

O3 Mini

60.6

Rank #24/69 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

Agentsverified

Tau2-Telecom

SourceClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

winner

84.8

Rank #22/58 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01

+56.1

O3 Mini

28.7

Rank #51/58 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-01-31

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIO3 Mini
BUZZWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

97

View report
10010010088
OpenAI

O3 Mini

o3-mini

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIO3 Mini
丸美小沐25 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O3 Mini

speed / latency

66 tok/s / 6491ms

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O3 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

46 tok/s / 2559ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O3 Mini

speed / latency

117 tok/s / 4809ms

input / output

No data

ZetaTechs API6 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O3 Mini

speed / latency

44 tok/s / 17418ms

input / output

No data

Cuz AI5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2285ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

O3 Mini

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

PoloAPI
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-c

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0082/M / $0.0082/M

OpenAI

O3 Mini

o3-mini-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.151/M / $0.603/M

CHB API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.068/M / $0.342/M

OpenAI

O3 Mini

o3-mini-high

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.021/M / $0.082/M

ZEN-AI VIP
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.205/M / $1.03/M

OpenAI

O3 Mini

o3-mini-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.045/M / $0.181/M

KKSJ-AI
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$9.25/M / $46.23/M

OpenAI

O3 Mini

o3-mini-2025-01-31

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.136/M / $0.542/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and O3 Mini: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIO3 Mini
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

O3 Mini

O3 Mini is stronger when you prioritize Average speed.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 122 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs O3 Mini into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5 4claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-5-4ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-5ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5 2claude-opus-4-6-vs-gpt-5-2ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3claude-opus-4-6-vs-qwen3

Data as of Jul 3, 2026, 02:14 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.