Data points: 28
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5-9B, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 0.
Evidence depth
28 data points
Includes 3 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 0 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 3 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-9Bclaude-opus-4-6-vs-qwen3-5-9b | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 3 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.6
64.1
Avg. score
Qwen3.5-9B
35.7
Selected category
Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 31.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0%
Rank #37/152 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5-9B
78.6%
Rank #63/152 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6%
Rank #46/150 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5-9B
8.6%
Rank #73/150 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7%
Rank #22/149 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5-9B
27.7%
Rank #120/149 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| No shared provider examples are available yet. | ||
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5-9B: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 28 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-9B into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | Qwen3.5-9B exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input TextImagevideo Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | 9B |
| Tokenizer | Claude | Qwen3 |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | qwen/qwen3.5-9b |
| References | No data | No data |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
