Data points: 76
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 1.
Evidence depth
76 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plusclaude-opus-4-6-vs-qwen3-5-omni-plus | Model A Claude Opus 4.6 | Model B Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 5 wins | 1 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | First-token latency |
| Model metadata | Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
| Developer | Anthropic | No data |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $6.25/M#41 | $0.400/M#16 |
| SciCode | 45.7%#20 | 40.5%#43 |
| Time to first answer token | 1.32 s#33 | 1.23 s#30 |
| Output price | $25.00/M#46 | $4.80/M#35 |
| GPQA | 84.0%#38 | 82.6%#46 |
| HLE | 18.6%#43 | 13.9%#56 |
| Blended price | $10.94/M#67 | $1.50/M#46 |
| Time to first token | 1.32 s#54 | 1.23 s#49 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 Audit score 84 728480100 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
小水管 API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 6167ms input / output $0/M / $0/M | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M / $0/M |
素墨API5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 47 tok/s / 2344ms input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
42公益站0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
91VIP0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AI Claw API0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0.500/M / $0.500/M | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus-2026-03-15 speed / latency No data input / output $0.050/M / $0.050/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $1.64/M / $8.22/M | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus speed / latency No data input / output $0.099/M / $1.17/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency. |
TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 76 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
