LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 79

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 Plus, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 2.

Evidence depth

79 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 3 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 11 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

claude-opus-4-6-vs-qwen3-5-plus

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins3 wins2 wins
Where it leadsFirst-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.Qwen3.5 Plus exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling.
DeveloperAnthropicAlibaba
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens65.5K tokens
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2026
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

TextImagevideo

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeQwen3
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastqwen/qwen3.5-plus-20260420
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
QwenQwen3.5 Plus
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
QwenQwen3.5 Plus
小水管 APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

84

View report
728480100
Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

No audit yet

Omini ApiWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

78

View report
70728088
Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

No audit yet

RenRen APIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

78

View report
70728088
Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
QwenQwen3.5 Plus
Rnglg2 API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3926ms

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

TradingBase API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 1437ms

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 20086ms

input / output

No data

小水管 API10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

45 tok/s / 6167ms

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

speed / latency

54 tok/s / 4374ms

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

6i2 API5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

280 tok/s / 3242ms

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Cuz AI5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2285ms

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Seamee API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.110/M / $0.660/M

10dian-API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.060/M / $0.060/M

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen-3.5-Plus

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

Zero API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.342/M / $1.71/M

Qwen

Qwen3.5 Plus

qwen3.5-plus

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.082/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.5 Plus: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
QwenQwen3.5 Plus
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 79 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 Plus into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 03:55 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.