Data points: 106
Model compare
The readout for Claude Opus 4.7 Max and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7 Max. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
Claude Opus 4.7 Max has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 57.1 to 42.9.
Evidence depth
106 data points
Includes 26 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.7 Max
The charts below split 33 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.7 Max and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.7 Max | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 57.1 pts | 42.9 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 5 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | No data | 400K tokens |
| Max output | No data | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | No data | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.7 Max | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | No data | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.2 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.7 Max and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads these benchmark categories: Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Multimodal.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Math, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
57.9
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.9
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads by 10.3
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads by 4.8
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads by 2.4
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads by 5.3
GPT-5.2 leads by 7.6
No data
Claude Opus 4.7 Max leads by 26.1
GPT-5.2 leads by 5.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner69.0
Rank #15/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
53.0
Rank #50/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner94.2%
Rank #1/188 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
71.2%
Rank #110/188 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner54.7%
Rank #3/187 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner75.8
Rank #6/15 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
52.9
Rank #12/15 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
70.3
Rank #18/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner72.7
Rank #13/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner80.4
Rank #14/25 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
61.4
Rank #22/25 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner12.0
Rank #19/73 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
11.6
Rank #20/73 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner87.6
Rank #3/43 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
80.0
Rank #12/43 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner64.3
Rank #5/37 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
55.6
Rank #25/37 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner64.2
Rank #7/65 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
52.2
Rank #34/65 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner54.5
Rank #9/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
52.1
Rank #18/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner83.0
Rank #6/55 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
80.8
Rank #11/55 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner53.5
Rank #8/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
42.2
Rank #22/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner39.6
Rank #13/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
35.4
Rank #21/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner45.8
Rank #13/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
43.8
Rank #16/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner91.4
Rank #14/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
90.3
Rank #19/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
36.2
Rank #77/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner79.7
Rank #39/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner91.0
Rank #2/22 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
82.1
Rank #8/22 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner1320.0
Rank #5/66 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
1219.0
Rank #35/66 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
50.5
Rank #29/35 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner70.3
Rank #11/35 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
58.6
Rank #53/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner75.4
Rank #21/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner45.9
Rank #2/20 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
34.3
Rank #7/20 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner78.0
Rank #6/21 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
47.3
Rank #20/21 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner79.3
Rank #15/25 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
65.8
Rank #19/25 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner70.3
Rank #17/53 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
22.0
Rank #48/53 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7 Max
winner88.6
Rank #36/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.7 Max | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.7 Max | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
5 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 Max speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 60 tok/s / 3331ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 Max speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 Max claude-opus-4-7-max speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $4.00/M/$20.00/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-2025-12-11 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $3.50/M |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 Max speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 Max speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.7 Max claude-opus-4-7-max speed / latency No data input / output $0.714/M/$3.57/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-medium speed / latency No data input / output $0.250/M | |
Claude Opus 4.7 Max claude-opus-4-7-max speed / latency No data input / output $1.75/M/$8.75/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $3.50/M |
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7 Max. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
