LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 82

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

82 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

claude-sonnet-4-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro

Model A

Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Model B

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providersAverage speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Sonnet 4.5 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokens
Max output64K tokens65.5K tokens
ReleasedSep 2025Jun 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

TextImageFileAudiovideo

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeGemini
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-312025-01-31
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5google/gemini-2.5-pro
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
MMLU-Pro
86.0%#13
86.2%#12
LiveCodeBench
59.0%#44
80.1%#18
Time to first answer token
1.29 s#29
21.28 s#73
Input price
$3.00/M#39
$1.25/M#30
SciCode
42.8%#32
42.8%#32
GPQA
72.7%#75
84.4%#36
HLE
7.1%#77
21.1%#37
Output speed
53.1 tok/s#88
134.3 tok/s#38

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
CatClaw API45 tests
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

speed / latency

46 tok/s / 5111ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 23637ms

input / output

No data

YUNWU API10 tests
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 3271ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

天宫造物10 tests
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

speed / latency

45 tok/s / 3170ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Completions5 tests
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

speed / latency

21 tok/s / 1085ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepRouter5 tests
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

92 tok/s / 16347ms

input / output

No data

MapleLeaf API
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

claude-sonnet-4.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.13/M / $9.00/M

Crond
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

c/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0004/M / $0.0004/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$2.50/M / $20.00/M

CHB API
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.205/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.034/M / $0.274/M

ZEN-AI VIP
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.123/M / $0.616/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.051/M / $0.411/M

UnifyLLM
Claude

Claude Sonnet 4.5

claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-c

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.080/M / $0.080/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

z/gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.750/M / $6.00/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
When to choose each model

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 82 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 05:54 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.