Data points: 111
Model compare
The readout for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 44 to 56.
Evidence depth
111 data points
Includes 22 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Flash
The charts below split 28 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 44.0 pts | 56.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 3 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | 8.2K tokens | 65.5K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input File |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-08-31 | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | cohere/command-a | google/gemini-2.5-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Command A
Command A is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Knowledge, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Command A
44.6
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45.4
Command A leads by 9.8
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 10.4
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 3.4
Command A leads by 9.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 4.6
No data
Command A
Command A leads by 11.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Command A
32.0
Rank #84/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner45.0
Rank #68/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
$2.50/M
Rank #131/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$4.38/M
Rank #127/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner$0.850/M
Rank #67/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner$2.50/M
Rank #75/162 · confidence 4
Command A
71.2%
Rank #99/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner83.2%
Rank #40/125 · confidence 4
Command A
0.3
Rank #68/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner1.4
Rank #50/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner46.0
Rank #70/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45.9
Rank #72/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
52.7%
Rank #160/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner79.0%
Rank #76/188 · confidence 4
Command A
4.6%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner11.1%
Rank #89/187 · confidence 4
Command A
28.7%
Rank #92/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner69.5%
Rank #30/115 · confidence 4
Command A
winner37.8
Rank #68/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
29.1
Rank #88/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
28.1%
Rank #145/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner39.4%
Rank #80/185 · confidence 4
Command A
81.9%
Rank #46/74 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner98.1%
Rank #7/74 · confidence 4
Command A
9.7%
Rank #58/68 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner82.3%
Rank #11/68 · confidence 4
Command A
14.1
Rank #90/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner93.3
Rank #6/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
8.9
Rank #90/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner26.5
Rank #51/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner11.4
Rank #67/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
5.1
Rank #79/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner76.1
Rank #68/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68.3
Rank #76/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner22.5
Rank #71/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
14.1
Rank #86/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
63.2
Rank #46/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner65.5
Rank #43/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner73.9
Rank #24/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
39.0
Rank #74/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Command A
winner80.7
Rank #53/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
14.9
Rank #84/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-06-17
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency 141 tok/s / 2052ms input / output No data |
5 tests | Command A speed / latency 121 tok/s / 518ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A command-a-03-2025 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $3.65/M/$14.60/M | Gemini 2.5 Flash gemini-2.5-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $4.38/M |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Command A command-a-03-2025 speed / latency No data input / output $31.82/M/$127.27/M | Gemini 2.5 Flash gemini-2.5-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.514/M |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
