Data points: 125
Model compare
The readout for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Command A. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Command A
Command A has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 61.3 to 38.7.
Evidence depth
125 data points
Includes 29 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Command A
The charts below split 34 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 61.3 pts | 38.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 4 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | 8.2K tokens | 65.5K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-08-31 | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | cohere/command-a | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Command A
Command A is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Knowledge, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency).
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Command A
45.1
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Pro
46.2
Command A leads by 2.1
Command A leads by 4.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 9.3
Command A leads by 15.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 10.0
No data
Command A
Command A leads by 8.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Command A
32.0
Rank #84/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner43.0
Rank #76/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner0.48 s
Rank #5/66 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
19.85 s
Rank #43/66 · confidence 4
Command A
winner0.48 s
Rank #8/66 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
19.85 s
Rank #59/66 · confidence 4
Command A
59.0 tok/s
Rank #54/66 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner153.2 tok/s
Rank #20/66 · confidence 4
Command A
$2.50/M
Rank #131/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner$1.25/M
Rank #107/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$4.38/M
Rank #127/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner$3.44/M
Rank #117/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Command A
71.2%
Rank #99/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner86.2%
Rank #15/125 · confidence 4
Command A
46.0
Rank #70/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner66.0
Rank #41/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
0.3
Rank #68/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner2.6
Rank #44/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
52.7%
Rank #160/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner84.4%
Rank #49/188 · confidence 4
Command A
4.6%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner21.1%
Rank #53/187 · confidence 4
Command A
28.7%
Rank #92/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner80.1%
Rank #18/115 · confidence 4
Command A
27.9
Rank #46/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner33.3
Rank #44/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
28.1%
Rank #145/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner42.8%
Rank #44/185 · confidence 4
Command A
37.8
Rank #68/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner42.8
Rank #47/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
9.7%
Rank #58/68 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner88.7%
Rank #5/68 · confidence 4
Command A
81.9%
Rank #46/74 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner96.7%
Rank #15/74 · confidence 4
Command A
14.1
Rank #90/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner87.4
Rank #19/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
8.9
Rank #90/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner39.0
Rank #25/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
76.1
Rank #68/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner84.4
Rank #49/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
11.4
Rank #67/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner21.1
Rank #50/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
22.5
Rank #71/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner25.8
Rank #63/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
63.2
Rank #46/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner74.9
Rank #30/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner73.9
Rank #24/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
48.7
Rank #59/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner9.2
Rank #43/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
7.1
Rank #44/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner10.9
Rank #43/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
8.6
Rank #44/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner718.0
Rank #43/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
672.0
Rank #44/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Command A
winner80.7
Rank #53/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Gemini 2.5 Pro
54.1
Rank #65/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-03-01
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Command A | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
5 tests | Command A speed / latency 121 tok/s / 518ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A command-a-03-2025 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $3.65/M/$14.60/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $10.95/M |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: Command A. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
