Data points: 90
Model compare
The readout for Command A and Qwen3, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Qwen3. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Qwen3
Qwen3 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 28 to 72.
Evidence depth
90 data points
Includes 11 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Qwen3
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Qwen3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Command A | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 28.0 pts | 72.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 3 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 8.2K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Command A | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | No data |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jul 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | 235B / 22B active |
| Tokenizer | Other | Qwen3 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-08-31 | 2025-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | cohere/command-a | qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Command A and Qwen3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Command A
Command A is stronger in benchmark categories (Knowledge) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency).
Qwen3
Qwen3 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Command A
44.6
Avg. score
Qwen3
45.2
Command A
Qwen3 leads by 5.2
Qwen3 leads by 1.9
Command A leads by 14.5
Qwen3 leads by 12.3
Qwen3
Command A
Command A
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Command A
32.0
Rank #84/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-05-20
Qwen3
winner53.0
Rank #50/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-07-01
Command A
$2.50/M
Rank #131/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner$0.200/M
Rank #27/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$4.38/M
Rank #127/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner$0.350/M
Rank #28/162 · confidence 4
Command A
$10.00/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner$0.800/M
Rank #29/162 · confidence 4
Command A
71.2%
Rank #99/125 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner77.7%
Rank #74/125 · confidence 4
Command A
4.6%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner6.8%
Rank #116/187 · confidence 4
Command A
52.7%
Rank #160/188 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner65.9%
Rank #129/188 · confidence 4
Command A
28.7%
Rank #92/115 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner51.5%
Rank #57/115 · confidence 4
Command A
28.1%
Rank #145/185 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner30.4%
Rank #137/185 · confidence 4
Command A
81.9%
Rank #46/74 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner97.5%
Rank #10/74 · confidence 4
Command A
9.7%
Rank #58/68 · confidence 4
Qwen3
winner72.7%
Rank #18/68 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Command A | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Command A | Qwen3 |
|---|---|---|
65 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency 88 tok/s / 14234ms input / output No data |
15 tests | Command A speed / latency 121 tok/s / 518ms input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency 41 tok/s / 7575ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A command-a-03-2025 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $3.65/M/$14.60/M | Qwen3 qwen3-4b speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.730/M |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Command A speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Command A command-a-03-2025 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | Qwen3 qwen3-4b speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request |
Weighted outcome: Qwen3. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
