Data points: 39
The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5
GPT-5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 3.
Evidence depth
39 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 0 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5
The charts below split 8 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-5deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-gpt-5 | Model A DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Model B GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
51.5
Avg. score
GPT-5
60
Selected category
Coding
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads by 9.7
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner$0.420/M
Rank #17/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5
$10.00/M
Rank #103/138 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner$0.315/M
Rank #26/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5
$3.44/M
Rank #101/138 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner$0.280/M
Rank #39/138 · confidence 4
GPT-5
$1.25/M
Rank #94/138 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner83.6%
Rank #34/113 · confidence 4
GPT-5
80.6%
Rank #53/113 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner8.6%
Rank #73/150 · confidence 4
GPT-5
5.4%
Rank #102/150 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner73.8%
Rank #79/152 · confidence 4
GPT-5
67.3%
Rank #95/152 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
55.4%
Rank #53/108 · confidence 4
GPT-5
winner55.8%
Rank #51/108 · confidence 4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
winner39.9%
Rank #53/149 · confidence 4
GPT-5
38.8%
Rank #65/149 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No shared provider examples are available yet. | ||
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp DeepSeek V3.2 Exp does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | GPT-5 GPT-5 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: GPT-5 leads across 39 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp exposes 163.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | GPT-5 exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Released | No data | Aug 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-07-31 | 2024-09-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-exp | openai/gpt-5 |
| References | No data | No data |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
