LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.2

deepseek-v3-2-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsFree providers, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage
Model metadataDeepSeek V3.2 exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperDeepSeekOpenAI
Context window131.1K tokens128K tokens
Max output64K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerDeepSeekGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDdeepseek/deepseek-v3.2openai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
OpenAIGPT-5.2
LiveCodeBench
59.3%#43
88.9%#4
MMLU-Pro
83.7%#23
87.4%#6
GPQA
75.1%#68
90.3%#9
HLE
10.5%#64
35.4%#9
SciCode
38.7%#54
52.1%#9
Input price
$0.500/M#18
$1.75/M#35
Output price
$1.60/M#21
$14.00/M#43
Blended price
$0.775/M#31
$4.81/M#62

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
OpenAIGPT-5.2
6345ywz API35 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

227 tok/s / 1884ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N30 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

37 tok/s / 1522ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

RinkoAI30 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

25 tok/s / 2484ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

星见雅 API20 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

21 tok/s / 15336ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 2671ms

input / output

No data

theoldllm-api-pro15 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

95 tok/s / 3207ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 1543ms

input / output

No data

10dian-API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2(次模型)

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.100/M / $0.100/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

紫脑喵
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2-exp

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $600.00/M

Zero API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.018/M / $0.028/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.120/M / $0.959/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Recent tests.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.26 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:46 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.