Data points: 41
The readout for DeepSeek V4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.
Evidence depth
41 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Pro
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare DeepSeek V4 vs Gemini 2.5 Prodeepseek-v4-vs-gemini-2-5-pro | Model A DeepSeek V4 | Model B Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 1 wins | 5 wins |
| Where it leads | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input. |
| Developer | DeepSeek | |
| Context window | No data | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 65.5K tokens |
| Released | No data | Jun 2025 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFileAudiovideo Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
CatClaw API40 tests | DeepSeek V4 speed / latency 47 tok/s / 2487ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 48 tok/s / 23637ms input / output No data |
3173721 API0 tests | DeepSeek V4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
CookingAI0 tests | DeepSeek V4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
KFCV500 tests | DeepSeek V4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Navy API0 tests | DeepSeek V4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
DeepSeek V4 deepseek-v4 speed / latency No data input / output $0.050/M / $0.050/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0.100/M / $0.100/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | DeepSeek V4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | DeepSeek V4 DeepSeek V4 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency. | Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Gemini 2.5 Pro leads across 41 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from DeepSeek V4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
