Data points: 65
Model compare
The readout for Free and GPT-OSS, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-OSS. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-OSS
GPT-OSS has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 0 to 100.
Evidence depth
65 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-OSS
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Free and GPT-OSS: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Free | GPT-OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 0.0 pts | 100.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Max output | No data | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Free | GPT-OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Openrouter | No data |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Aug 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | 120B |
| Tokenizer | Router | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | openrouter/free | openai/gpt-oss-120b:free |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Free and GPT-OSS: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Free
Free does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
GPT-OSS
GPT-OSS has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Free | GPT-OSS |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Free | GPT-OSS |
|---|---|---|
6532 tests | Free speed / latency 20 tok/s / 25300ms input / output No data | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
20 tests | Free speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-OSS speed / latency 164 tok/s / 1247ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Free openrouter/free speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/request | GPT-OSS gpt-oss-20b speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.438/M |
0 tests | Free speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Free speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: GPT-OSS. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingReasoning |
|---|
