Data points: 39
The readout for Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 3.
Evidence depth
39 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 3 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Pro
The charts below split 3 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision vs Gemini 2.5 Progemini-1-0-pro-vision-vs-gemini-2-5-pro | Model A Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Model B Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
-
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Pro
60.8
Selected category
Agents
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision models/gemini-1.0-pro-vision-latest speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $2.50/M / $5.00/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Gemini 2.5 Pro leads across 39 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision vs Gemini 2.5 Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Cheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ||
| Context window | No data | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 65.5K tokens |
| Released | No data | Jun 2025 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFileAudiovideo Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
google/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
$75.00/M / $75.00/M
天絮 API0 tests | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
钱多多 API0 tests | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision gemini-1.0-pro-vision-latest speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.049/M / $0.196/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05-nothinking speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $36.71/M / $293.71/M |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
