Data points: 46
The readout for Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 4.
Evidence depth
46 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.4
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 vs GPT-5.4gemini-1-5-pro-001-vs-gpt-5-4 | Model A Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 | Model B GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 0 wins | 4 wins |
| Where it leads | No data | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Context window | No data | 1.1M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 128K tokens |
| Released | No data | Mar 2026 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.4 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 1.5 Pro 001
-
Avg. score
GPT-5.4
66.6
Selected category
Agents
GPT-5.4
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
AIGCBAR0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
ocool AI0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
SanShui API0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 gemini-1.5-pro-001 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.548/M / $2.19/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-openai-compact speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $10.27/M / $61.64/M |
兔子API0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 gemini-1.5-pro-001 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $4.00/M / $16.00/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M / $450.00/M |
钱多多 API0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 gemini-1.5-pro-001 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $1.22/M / $4.90/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $36.71/M / $220.28/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. | GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 46 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Gemini 1.5 Pro 001 vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
