Data points: 74
Model compare
The readout for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 4 to 96.
Evidence depth
74 data points
Includes 9 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 1.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 4.0 pts | 96.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 4 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | No data | 400K tokens |
| Max output | No data | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | No data | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Gemini 1.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Released | No data | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.2 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Gemini 1.5 Pro has these operational advantages: First-token latency.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 1.5 Pro
44.8
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.8
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 16.3
GPT-5.2 leads by 14.4
GPT-5.2 leads by 1.8
GPT-5.2 leads by 12.3
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
75.0%
Rank #89/125 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner81.4%
Rank #54/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
4.9%
Rank #138/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
58.9%
Rank #144/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner71.2%
Rank #110/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
29.5
Rank #87/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
GPT-5.2
winner52.1
Rank #18/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Gemini 1.5 Pro
31.6%
Rank #86/115 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner66.9%
Rank #36/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
29.5%
Rank #139/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner40.4%
Rank #64/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
58.9
Rank #86/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
GPT-5.2
winner90.3
Rank #19/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Gemini 1.5 Pro
4.9
Rank #80/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
GPT-5.2
winner35.4
Rank #21/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Gemini 1.5 Pro
10.0
Rank #93/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
GPT-5.2
winner42.2
Rank #22/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 1.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 1.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 2671ms input / output No data |
5 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 32 tok/s / 1965ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Gemini 1.5 Pro gemini-1.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-openai-compact speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
Gemini 1.5 Pro gemini-1.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | |
Gemini 1.5 Pro gemini-1.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0.342/M/$1.37/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.342/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
