Data points: 64
Model compare
The readout for Gemini 2.5 Flash Image and GPT-4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash Image. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 66.7 to 33.3.
Evidence depth
64 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Flash Image
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash Image and GPT-4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 66.7 pts | 33.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Provider coverage | Free providers |
| Context window | 32.8K tokens | 8.2K tokens |
| Max output | 8.2K tokens | 4.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input ImageText Output ImageText |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | |
| Released | Oct 2025 | May 2023 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Gemini | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-31 | 2021-09-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | google/gemini-2.5-flash-image | openai/gpt-4 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash Image and GPT-4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Provider coverage.
GPT-4
GPT-4 has these operational advantages: Free providers.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image
-
Avg. score
GPT-4
49.5
No data
GPT-4
No data
No data
No data
No data
No data
No data
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image | GPT-4 |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image gemini-2.5-flash-image speed / latency No data input / output $0.514/request | GPT-4 gpt-4 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash Image. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputImage outputStructured outputsJSON mode | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
