Data points: 54
Model compare
The readout for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Recraft V3, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 100 to 0.
Evidence depth
54 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 3 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Flash
The charts below split 3 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Recraft V3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Recraft V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 100.0 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 65.5K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input FileImageTextAudiovideo |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Recraft V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Recraft | |
| Released | Jun 2025 | May 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Gemini | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | google/gemini-2.5-flash | recraft/recraft-v3 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Recraft V3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage.
Recraft V3
Recraft V3 does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45.5
Avg. score
Recraft V3
-
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
No data
No data
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Recraft V3 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Recraft V3 |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Recraft V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Recraft V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.147/M/$1.22/M | Recraft V3 recraft-ai/recraft-v3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.343/request |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
Input TextImage Output Image |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputImage output |
|---|
