Why is this comparison indexable?

It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.

Are missing metrics invented?

No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Back to models

Data points: 55

Key Takeaways

The readout for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini Embedding 001, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 2.

Evidence depth

55 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Embedding 001 gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gemini-embedding-001	Model A Gemini 2.5 Pro	Model B Gemini Embedding 001
Overall leader	Tie	Tie
Verified metric wins	2 wins	2 wins
Where it leads	Provider coverage, Recent tests	Cheapest input price, Free providers

Model compare

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gemini-embedding-001

Model A

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Model B

Gemini Embedding 001

Overall leader

Tie

Verified metric wins

2 wins

Where it leads

Provider coverage, Recent tests

Cheapest input price, Free providers

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Gemini Embedding 001
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Gemini Embedding 001
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Gemini Embedding 001
5 tests	Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 92 tok/s / 16347ms input / output No data

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini Embedding 001: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance	Gemini 2.5 Pro	Gemini Embedding 001
When to choose each model	Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Provider coverage, Recent tests.	Gemini Embedding 001 Gemini Embedding 001 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 55 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?: It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?: No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Continue from Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Embedding 001 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

Model metadata	Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.	No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
Developer	Google	Google
Context window	1.0M tokens	No data
Max output	65.5K tokens	No data
Released	Jun 2025	No data
Modalities	Input TextImageFileAudiovideo Output Text	No data
Features	Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning	None listed
Parameters	No data	No data
Tokenizer	Gemini	No data
Knowledge cutoff	2025-01-31	No data
OpenRouter ID	google/gemini-2.5-pro	No data
References	No data	No data