Data points: 85
Model compare
The readout for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 73.3 to 26.7.
Evidence depth
85 data points
Includes 11 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Pro
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 73.3 pts | 26.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFileAudiovideo Output |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral | |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Aug 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Gemini | Mistral |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-31 | 2025-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | google/gemini-2.5-pro | mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads these benchmark categories: Coding.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Pro
51.6
Avg. score
Mistral Medium 3.1
44.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads by 4.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 12.3
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
21.44 s
Rank #92/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner0.52 s
Rank #9/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
21.44 s
Rank #124/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner0.52 s
Rank #13/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner139.9 tok/s
Rank #36/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
81.5 tok/s
Rank #76/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$1.25/M
Rank #109/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner$0.400/M
Rank #61/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$10.00/M
Rank #122/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner$2.00/M
Rank #61/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
$3.44/M
Rank #119/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner$0.800/M
Rank #64/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner86.2%
Rank #15/125 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
68.3%
Rank #107/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner84.4%
Rank #48/187 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
58.8%
Rank #145/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner21.1%
Rank #52/186 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
4.4%
Rank #146/186 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner80.1%
Rank #18/115 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
40.6%
Rank #71/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner42.8%
Rank #43/184 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
33.8%
Rank #117/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Pro google/gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $5.00/M/$30.00/M | Mistral Medium 3.1 mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 12.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
