LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 83

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Qwen3

Qwen3 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

83 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Qwen3

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3

gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen3

Model A

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Model B

Qwen

Qwen3

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Provider coverageAverage speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Recent tests
Model metadataGemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.Qwen3 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperGoogleNo data
Context window1.0M tokens262.1K tokens
Max output65.5K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFileAudiovideo

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo data235B / 22B active
TokenizerGeminiQwen3
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-312025-06-30
OpenRouter IDgoogle/gemini-2.5-proqwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
QwenQwen3
AIME
88.7%#6
72.7%#15
Output price
$10.00/M#41
$0.400/M#6
Input price
$1.25/M#30
$0.150/M#9
MATH-500
96.7%#16
97.5%#11
Blended price
$3.44/M#58
$0.213/M#12
MMLU-Pro
86.2%#12
77.7%#51
LiveCodeBench
80.1%#18
51.5%#54
Time to first answer token
23.08 s#77
1.12 s#26

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
QwenQwen3
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
QwenQwen3
AI Tools194 tests
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 7617ms

input / output

No data

OpenRouter65 tests
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3

speed / latency

88 tok/s / 14234ms

input / output

No data

RinkoAI45 tests
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3

speed / latency

285 tok/s / 3763ms

input / output

No data

SWT-API35 tests
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.0006/M / $0.0050/M

Qwen

Qwen3

qwen3-8b

speed / latency

39 tok/s / 15961ms

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.037/M

专盾Procdn30 tests
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Qwen

Qwen3

speed / latency

117 tok/s / 21270ms

input / output

No data

Claw API
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro-preview

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$10.27/M / $82.19/M

Qwen

Qwen3

qwen3-235b

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

小水管 API
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Qwen

Qwen3

qwen3-8b

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Koyeb AI Gateway
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0006/M / $0.0050/M

Qwen

Qwen3

qwen3-8b

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.037/M

素墨API
Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

cli/gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.100/M / $0.100/M

Qwen

Qwen3

qwen3-8b

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
QwenQwen3
When to choose each model

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Provider coverage.

Qwen3

Qwen3 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Qwen3 leads across 83 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-56 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:47 AM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.