LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 54

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Gemini Embedding 001 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 2.

Evidence depth

54 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Gemini Embedding 001 vs GPT-5.2

gemini-embedding-001-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins2 wins2 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Free providersProvider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperGoogleOpenAI
Context windowNo data128K tokens
Max outputNo data16.4K tokens
ReleasedNo dataDec 2025
ModalitiesNo data

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
GeminiGemini Embedding 001
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
GeminiGemini Embedding 001
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
GeminiGemini Embedding 001
OpenAIGPT-5.2
N1N15 tests
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

ModelPool5 tests
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-embedding-001

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.013/M / $0.051/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 5256ms

input / output

$0.150/M / $1.20/M

小水管 API5 tests
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

71 tok/s / 2893ms

input / output

No data

AAAI0 tests
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

AASS API0 tests
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Koyeb AI Gateway
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-embedding-001

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0001/M / $0.0003/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.300/M

SWT-API
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-embedding-001

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0001/M / $0.0003/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.300/M

ZEN-AI VIP
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-embedding-001

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0062/M / $0.0062/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.072/M / $0.575/M

Claw API
Gemini

Gemini Embedding 001

gemini-embedding-001

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.021/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.034/M / $0.274/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini Embedding 001 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
GeminiGemini Embedding 001
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

Gemini Embedding 001

Gemini Embedding 001 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 54 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Gemini Embedding 001 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

GeminiGemini Embedding 001 vs GPT-5.44 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Embedding 0014 verified data pointsGeminiGemini Embedding 001 vs GPT-54 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Embedding 0014 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:07 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.