LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 82

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-4.5 Air and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.

Evidence depth

82 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.4

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-4.5 Air vs GPT-5.4

glm-4-5-air-vs-gpt-5-4

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins1 wins5 wins
Where it leadsAverage speedCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGLM-4.5 Air exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperZhipu AIOpenAI
Context window131.1K tokens1.1M tokens
Max output131.1K tokens128K tokens
ReleasedJul 2025Mar 2026
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerOtherGPT
Knowledge cutoff2024-12-31No data
OpenRouter IDz-ai/glm-4.5-airopenai/gpt-5.4
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air
OpenAIGPT-5.4
GPQA
73.3%#74
92.0%#3
SciCode
30.6%#90
56.6%#3
HLE
6.8%#79
41.6%#4
Input price
$0.170/M#10
$2.50/M#37
Output price
$0.980/M#16
$15.00/M#44
Blended price
$0.372/M#20
$5.63/M#63
Output speed
82.9 tok/s#62
92.4 tok/s#56
Time to first token
1.65 s#62
134.24 s#110

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air
OpenAIGPT-5.4
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Mars HK125 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 6084ms

input / output

No data

6345ywz API15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

zai-org/GLM-4.5-Air

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.019/M / $0.118/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 6581ms

input / output

$0.342/M / $2.05/M

OpenRouter10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

speed / latency

20 tok/s / 33054ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

素墨API10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

speed / latency

27 tok/s / 39365ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Chlink API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

50 tok/s / 5476ms

input / output

No data

OpenRouter Fans
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

z-ai/glm-4.5-air:free

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0050/M / $0.0050/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.600/M / $4.80/M

紫脑喵
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

glm-4.5-air

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-high

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

Zero API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

glm-4.5-air

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.075/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.171/M / $1.03/M

CHB API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.5 Air

zai-org/GLM-4.5-Air

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.03/M / $1.03/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.034/M / $0.205/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5 Air and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air
OpenAIGPT-5.4
When to choose each model

GLM-4.5 Air

GLM-4.5 Air is stronger when you prioritize Average speed.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 82 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4.5 Air vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.5 Air6 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air vs GPT-56 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4.5 Air vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.5 Air6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 03:09 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.