Data points: 46
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.5 Air and Nemotron Nano 9B V2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.5 Air. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 66.7 to 33.3.
Evidence depth
46 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.5 Air
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5 Air and Nemotron Nano 9B V2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.5 Air | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 66.7 pts | 33.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Free providers, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price |
| Context window | 131.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 98.3K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.5 Air | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | NVIDIA |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | 9B |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.5-air | nvidia/nemotron-nano-9b-v2 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5 Air and Nemotron Nano 9B V2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air has these operational advantages: Free providers, Provider coverage.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.5 Air
45.9
Avg. score
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
-
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air
GLM-4.5 Air
No data
No data
GLM-4.5 Air
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.5 Air | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.5 Air | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | GLM-4.5 Air speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5 Air speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5 Air speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5 Air speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5 Air speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Nemotron Nano 9B V2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.5 Air. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
