Data points: 89
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 30.7 to 69.3.
Evidence depth
89 data points
Includes 11 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-4.7
The charts below split 20 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.5V | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 30.7 pts | 69.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 65.5K tokens | 202.8K tokens |
| Max output | 16.4K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text | Input |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.5V | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | Z.ai |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-12-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.5v | z-ai/glm-4.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is stronger in benchmark categories (Math) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.5V
47.1
Avg. score
GLM-4.7
51.2
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 leads by 10.3
GLM-4.7 leads by 6.7
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.5V leads by 1.1
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.5V
1.83 s
Rank #54/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner0.64 s
Rank #20/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
1.83 s
Rank #97/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner0.64 s
Rank #28/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
41.3 tok/s
Rank #126/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner92.7 tok/s
Rank #67/139 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
winner$1.80/M
Rank #60/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
$2.20/M
Rank #69/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
winner$0.900/M
Rank #72/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
$1.00/M
Rank #76/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
$0.600/M
Rank #81/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
$0.600/M
Rank #81/163 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
75.1%
Rank #88/125 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner79.4%
Rank #66/125 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
57.3%
Rank #151/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner66.4%
Rank #126/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
3.6%
Rank #172/186 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner6.1%
Rank #126/186 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
35.2%
Rank #79/115 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner56.2%
Rank #48/115 · confidence 4
GLM-4.5V
18.8%
Rank #174/184 · confidence 4
GLM-4.7
winner35.4%
Rank #109/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.5V | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.5V | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
45 tests | GLM-4.5V speed / latency 73 tok/s / 6154ms input / output No data | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 16663ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 41223ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 speed / latency 309 tok/s / 3722ms input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.5V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-4.5V glm-4.5v speed / latency No data input / output $0.250/M/$0.750/M | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.250/M | |
GLM-4.5V glm-4.5v speed / latency No data input / output $0.274/M/$1.10/M | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.548/M | |
GLM-4.5V glm-4.5v speed / latency No data input / output $0.479/M/$1.44/M | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.575/M | |
GLM-4.5V zai-org/GLM-4.5V speed / latency No data input / output $0.509/M/$1.53/M | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 speed / latency No data input / output $5.09/M |
Weighted outcome: GLM-4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
