LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-4.6 and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.4

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.4

glm-4-6-vs-gpt-5-4

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins1 wins5 wins
Where it leadsAverage speedCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGLM-4.6 exposes 202.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperNo dataOpenAI
Context window202.8K tokens1.1M tokens
Max output131.1K tokens128K tokens
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 2026
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerOtherGPT
Knowledge cutoff2025-03-31No data
OpenRouter IDz-ai/glm-4.6openai/gpt-5.4
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.4
GPQA
63.2%#98
92.0%#3
SciCode
33.1%#83
56.6%#3
HLE
5.2%#85
41.6%#4
Input price
$0.600/M#23
$2.50/M#37
Output price
$2.20/M#25
$15.00/M#44
Blended price
$1.00/M#38
$5.63/M#63
Time to first answer token
1.74 s#39
134.24 s#111
Output speed
51.7 tok/s#87
92.4 tok/s#56

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.4
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Mars HK125 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 6084ms

input / output

No data

6345ywz API15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 6581ms

input / output

No data

Chlink API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

50 tok/s / 5476ms

input / output

No data

N1N5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1357ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

SmokeDivine AI5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

44 tok/s / 1119ms

input / output

No data

Seamee API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

ZhipuAI/GLM-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

3173721 API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

glm-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $450.00/M

紫脑喵
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

glm-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-high

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

Moyanjdc API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

glm-4.6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.058/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.085/M

涵冰API
ChatGLM

GLM-4.6

glm-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.020/M / $0.040/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.020/M / $0.120/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6 and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-4.6
OpenAIGPT-5.4
When to choose each model

GLM-4.6

GLM-4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.66 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.66 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:48 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.