Data points: 56
The readout for GLM-4.6V Flash and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.
Evidence depth
56 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.4
The charts below split 8 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GLM-4.6V Flash vs GPT-5.4glm-4-6v-flash-vs-gpt-5-4 | Model A GLM-4.6V Flash | Model B GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 2 wins | 4 wins |
| Where it leads | Average speed, Free providers | Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | Zhipu AI | OpenAI |
| Context window | No data | 1.1M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 128K tokens |
| Released | No data | Mar 2026 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.4 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GLM-4.6V Flash | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.6V Flash | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.6V Flash | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
6345ywz API15 tests | GLM-4.6V Flash zhipu/glm-4.6v-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.137/M / $0.137/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4 speed / latency 41 tok/s / 6581ms input / output $0.342/M / $2.05/M |
6i2 API5 tests | GLM-4.6V Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 428 tok/s / 4171ms input / output No data |
Claw API5 tests | GLM-4.6V Flash glm-4.6v-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M / $0/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4 speed / latency 53 tok/s / 5106ms input / output $0.342/M / $2.05/M |
UoCode5 tests | GLM-4.6V Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 31 tok/s / 2364ms input / output No data |
VSLLM5 tests | GLM-4.6V Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 60 tok/s / 2482ms input / output No data |
GLM-4.6V Flash zhipu/glm-4.6v-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4 speed / latency No data input / output $2.00/M / $12.00/M | |
GLM-4.6V Flash z-ai/glm-4.6v-flash-free speed / latency No data input / output $0/M / $0/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-openai-compact speed / latency No data input / output $749250.00/M / $4495500.00/M | |
GLM-4.6V Flash glm-4.6v-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.098/M / $0.098/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 speed / latency No data input / output $36.71/M / $220.28/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6V Flash and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.6V Flash | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.6V Flash GLM-4.6V Flash is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, Free providers. | GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 56 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.6V Flash vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
