Data points: 80
Model compare
The readout for GLM-4.6V and Kimi K2.5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 26.7 to 73.3.
Evidence depth
80 data points
Includes 7 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2.5
The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6V and Kimi K2.5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-4.6V | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 26.7 pts | 73.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 131.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 32.8K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input ImageTextvideo Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-4.6V | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | MoonshotAI |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jan 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-4.6v | moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.6V and Kimi K2.5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-4.6V
GLM-4.6V leads these benchmark categories: Math.
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-4.6V
47.4
Avg. score
Kimi K2.5
49.7
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 leads by 8.3
Kimi K2.5 leads by 6.0
Kimi K2.5
GLM-4.6V leads by 2.7
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-4.6V
winner$0.450/M
Rank #36/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
$1.20/M
Rank #85/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6V
winner$0.900/M
Rank #38/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
$3.00/M
Rank #85/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6V
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
$0.600/M
Rank #80/162 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6V
75.2%
Rank #85/125 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner87.1%
Rank #11/125 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
GLM-4.6V
56.6%
Rank #154/188 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner78.9%
Rank #79/188 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6V
3.7%
Rank #171/187 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner12.3%
Rank #84/187 · confidence 4
GLM-4.6V
27.2%
Rank #150/185 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner39.6%
Rank #76/185 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.6V | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.6V | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | GLM-4.6V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 14302ms input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-4.6V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 65 tok/s / 9952ms input / output No data |
10 tests | GLM-4.6V speed / latency 44 tok/s / 17440ms input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 15490ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-4.6V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 14 tok/s / 32712ms input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-4.6V speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-4.6V glm-4.6v speed / latency No data input / output $0.021/M/$0.062/M | Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.041/M | |
GLM-4.6V glm-4.6v speed / latency No data input / output $0.068/M/$0.205/M | Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $2.74/M |
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
