LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 56

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-4 Flash and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GLM-4 Flash

GLM-4 Flash currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.

Evidence depth

56 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GLM-4 Flash

The charts below split 10 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-4 Flash vs GPT-5.2

glm-4-flash-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins2 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Recent testsAverage speed, Provider coverage
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperZhipu AIOpenAI
Context windowNo data128K tokens
Max outputNo data16.4K tokens
ReleasedNo dataDec 2025
ModalitiesNo data

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-4 Flash
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4 Flash
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-4 Flash
OpenAIGPT-5.2
N1N35 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

speed / latency

78 tok/s / 1573ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 2671ms

input / output

No data

包子铺10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

speed / latency

47 tok/s / 363ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

51 tok/s / 2715ms

input / output

No data

6345ywz API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

speed / latency

16 tok/s / 4323ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

WSocket AI5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

54 tok/s / 1449ms

input / output

No data

Chlink API
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

glm-4-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $600.00/M

Koyeb AI Gateway
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

glm-4-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.300/M

SWT-API
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

glm-4-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.037/M / $0.300/M

不知道叫啥
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

glm-4-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$5.25/M / $42.00/M

钠 API
ChatGLM

GLM-4 Flash

glm-4-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2(xhigh)

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.329/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4 Flash and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-4 Flash
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

GLM-4 Flash

GLM-4 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Recent tests.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: GLM-4 Flash leads across 56 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-4 Flash vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ChatGLMGLM-4 Flash vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4 Flash6 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-4 Flash vs GPT-56 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4 Flash6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:43 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.